🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold move to ban social networking access for those under 16 is creating waves around the globe. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and parents are monitoring closely to see if this strategy will become a template for the rest of the world.

European Movement

Throughout Europe, a rising group of countries are exploring similar bans.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for under-15s, with the leader stating that mobile devices and networks are "robbing our youngsters' youth". A law is expected to be enacted soon.
• Norway is planning to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to shield children from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• The Irish government is developing a online verification tool to authenticate the identity and age of social media users. The media minister have indicated that an Australian-model ban could be "an options in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has asked lawmakers to pass a proposal lifting the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has recommended a similar action, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has advised parents to restrict their kids from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has adopted a symbolic statement calling for a ban for under-16s without parental consent is granted. While it warns of the "addictive" nature of these services, the resolution does not enact mandatory rules.

"A strong age limit is a useful foundation," stated the parliamentarian supporting the resolution.

The UK: A Cautious Eye

For the United Kingdom, the administration has remained open to a future ban, stating that "no option is discarded" but stressing any action must be "grounded in strong evidence".

Previously, momentum built behind a bill to enact restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end modified. Nonetheless, the government pledged to investigate the issue.

Charities have voiced apprehensions. A prominent charity founded by the relatives of a teenager who was lost after being exposed to harmful social media material argues that a simple age ban may not improve online safety and could lead to a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when users become eligible.

"This ban is a answer to the failure of the tech sector to design platforms and apps that are secure and fit for children," said a influential child protection advocate.

America: A Fragmented Picture

Stateside, regulation is largely happening at the regional level against a backdrop of federal inaction.

• The state of Utah demands adult approval for minors to use social media and limits overnight use.
• The state of Florida has passed a measure prohibiting those below 14 from accessing social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a rule limiting under-16s to one hour of social media time per day, with extra access needing adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted bills demanding parental consent for teenagers to set up social media accounts.

Even with cross-party agreement and suggestions from some individuals to follow Australia's lead, a US-wide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Views

Outside of these regions, other nations are also taking action.

• The Malaysian government plans to ban social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• Brazil has raised the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, global bodies take a more cautious stance. A major UN agency has warned that social media bans carry risks and "might backfire". The organization highlights that social networks can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable youth and that government action should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to improve child safeguards.

While this international discussion evolves, the actions of this nation and several other countries show that policymakers around the world are less and less content to wait for tech companies to make changes on their own.